What to know about the length of the jury’s deliberations at the Rittenhouse Trial?

Written by admin

What to know about the length of the jury’s deliberations at the Rittenhouse Trial?

Kenosha, Wis. – Only 12 people know for sure why the jury deliberations in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial went on for nearly three days without a verdict.

But one thing is clear: the length of the deliberation isn’t a good or bad sign for both sides, and there have been high-profile examples of both acquittals and convictions after lengthy deliberations.

The jurors clarified their point of view only that at least some of them wanted to revisit parts of the copious video footage shown at the trial and that they needed more copies of the 36 pages of jury instructions.

It can take several days for a jury to acquit or convict. Juries in Minneapolis deliberated for nearly 10 hours over two days in April before convicting Derek Chauvin, a former police officer, of charges including second-degree murder for the murder of George Floyd.

A Florida jury weighed charges against George Zimmerman for more than 16 hours before acquitting him in 2013, including second-degree murder for fatally shooting Trayvon Martin.

It took nearly 35 hours over nine days for California jurors to acquit actor Robert Blake of his wife’s murder charge in 2005. “You can’t read anything in this in terms of the length of the deliberations other than being very stressful for the parties,” said Ioan Mayen, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School.

Mr Main noted that Mr Rittenhouse’s defense sought to limit the number of re-views of the video by the jury, while prosecutors argued for unlimited viewing. It’s understandable, Mayen said, because his lawyers more likely want jurors to focus on Rittenhouse’s testimony.

See also  What is Kyle Rittenhouse charged with?

Defense lawyers’ best case is “if the jury considers what comes out of their client’s mouth,” Mr Maine said. As the hours went by in Mr Rittenhouse’s case, long stretches of words from the jury were recalled by the parties to the court for arguments on notes, motions and other matters.

Cornell Law School professor Valerie Hans said the time taken for a jury’s request for video evidence suggests that the panel is using an evidence-based approach, which could lead to a more thorough deliberation and impasse. Chances may be less. Studied the jury system.

He said that sometimes juries will take a “decision-driven” approach in which people express their opinions early in the deliberations. “If you immediately say ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ then you have made something of a public commitment” to a situation that is less likely to change, Ms Hans said.

He said this approach is more likely to lead to a hung jury.

Mr Rittenhouse, his family members and attorneys hide in a room a floor above the courtroom, where Kenosha County Circuit Court Judge Bruce Schroeder is working through other cases while he waits.

Milwaukee attorney John A. It takes a toll to know what the jury is thinking, said Birdsall, who is not involved in Rittenhouse’s trial but has endured a week of jury deliberation.

He said he spent those parts trying to work on his other affairs. “It’s so nerve-racking. You’re trying to parse every question that comes down to it to figure out where they are,” he said. “But, of course, it’s all just guesswork. It’s work.”

See also  How will your Thanksgiving be this year?

#length #jurys #deliberations #Rittenhouse #Trial

About the author


Leave a Comment

%d bloggers like this: