The resolution plan submitted to the nclt cannot be returned nor can it be amended by the court
The Court held that the resolution plan between the CoC and the successful resolution applicant is binding under the provisions of IBC and CIRP regulations and cannot be withdrawn.
The Court referred to the report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance. It has been said in this report that 71 percent cases are pending before NCLT for more than 180 days. This is not in line with the original purpose and timelines of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
A bench of Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah asked the NCLT and NCLAT to be sensitive to such delays. The apex court said, “Prior to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), judicial delay was the main reason for the failure of the insolvency system. We do not want the same situation with the current insolvency system.
The Supreme Court has given this 190-page decision to Ebix Singapore Pvt Ltd. dismissed the petition. Ebix had challenged the decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLT) on a petition by the committee of creditors of Educomp. The NCLAT had set aside the NCLT’s decision to allow the withdrawal of Ebix’s resolution plan.
Apart from this, the top court has given this decision in response to the petition of two other companies on the same issue. These companies had also raised the issue of right to withdraw or rectify the resolution plan under the IBC.
#resolution #plan #submitted #nclt #returned #amended #court