By labeling Putin a ‘war criminal’, Biden personalizes the conflict
Just hours before Mr. Biden’s announcement, his national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, told Mr. Putin’s chief national security adviser, Nikolai P. Petrushev, that “any potential Russian use of chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine” Decision” will have the same result. harsh western reaction. While no one will say this publicly, many of Mr Biden’s aides have worried in recent days that if the Russian leader feels that if the United States is trying to oppose his regime – it is likely that he will Weapons will reach. can be elevated.
So the debate that is going on in Washington now may actually trigger Mr. Putin. Some believe he may be out if the dissent, already visible in street demonstrations in Russia, poses a real threat to him. Others believe that his trigger point may be a more direct entry into the war by NATO countries, which are already providing antitank and antiaircraft weapons, which the Pentagon estimated would have killed at least 7,000 troops. Russian death toll.
Russo-Ukraine war: the main things to know
A former intelligence official noted that it was Hillary Clinton’s support for street protesters who opposed the election of pro-Putin lawmakers in Russia that ordered the Russian leader to hack the Democratic National Committee when Mrs. She was running for the presidency. Mr Putin is a believer, the official said in retaliation.
Mr Putin would have good reason to think the Biden administration is waiting for his exit, although US officials choose their words carefully to avoid the implication that Washington’s policy is to speed up the process. Mr Blinken, speaking to reporters on Thursday, said that “when all is said and done, there will be an independent Ukraine, and at some point there will be no Vladimir Putin.”
The last time a US president was at stake so much with a Russian or Soviet leader, it was 60 years ago during the Cuban Missile Crisis, widely considered the closest to the world. And yet at that time, in October 1962, President Kennedy’s tendency was to avoid privatizing the conflict – and to help his Soviet counterpart, Nikita S. Khrushchev, find a way out of the direct confrontation.
“I think it’s the most natural comparison of the moment,” said Fredrik Logwall, Harvard historian and Kennedy biographer.
“He continued to warn members of the X-COMM,” Kennedy set out to guide during the 13 days of the crisis, “that they had to look at things from Khrushchev’s point of view,” he said. “He said we had to give him something to get out of here. And he was careful in his public comments not to personalize criticisms of Khrushchev himself. It’s the direct opposite of what Biden did.”
#labeling #Putin #war #criminal #Biden #personalizes #conflict