Australian minister wins defamation case over tweet
The outcome of the case was not unheard of in a country with notoriously strict defamation laws, but it was unusual in that the defendant was no other politician or high-profile journalist, said Michael Douglas, a senior lecturer in private law at Western University. Australia.
“It is in line with the theme that this government is content to take a very heavy-handed approach to online speech which it does not like,” he said. He continued, “Cases like this are a reminder that, unless something changes, we’re going to see more and more cases like this, and every Australian should tread carefully before retweeting a quote and a The politician should be given a name.”
Mr Dutton has been open about his intention to crack down on deceptive or defamatory social media content. In March, he told a local radio station, “Some of these people who are trending on Twitter or who have the anonymity of different Twitter accounts are excluding all these statements and tweets that are clearly are defamatory – I’m going to start picking some of them to prosecute.”
Prime Minister Scott Morrison echoed that sentiment in October, when he vowed the government would do more to hold the social media giants accountable.
“Social media has become a coward’s palace where people can just go there, not say who they are, destroy people’s lives and say the worst and offensive things to people and do so without Anyone can do it,” Mr Morrison said.
In May, John Barillaro, then deputy premier of New South Wales, sued an Australian YouTuber, Jordan Shanks, for defamation, claiming that Mr Shanks had wrongly uploaded two videos that suggested he was corrupt. had given perjury and engaged in blackmail. He also said Mr Shanks was racist by attacking his Italian heritage, calling him “a con man driven by spaghetti, to the core”.
Mr. Shanks’ channel, FriendlyJordies, which has 600,000 subscribers, is known for its comedy and political commentary.
#Australian #minister #wins #defamation #case #tweet